Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2010, 3:22 pm
Pierre Legrand’s dissection of the Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2007) 2 JCL 253 (sadly not online, but forwarded by a colleague, and worth reading if you can find it). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
And as I have a strong interest in national security, counterinsurgency, and state-building, it can be expected that I will tend to lean toward those subjects (and their comparative aspects) in my future posts. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
(Remote access requires a username and password – for current OU members, Oxford SSO.) [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:21 pm
In Ralston v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:40 am
As the recent Clark v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:55 pm
Supreme Court’s judgment in DeShaney v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
Some of her recent publications include: * RED FAMILIES V. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
Brownlie concerned a car accident during a family holiday to Egypt, which tragically claimed the lives of Sir Ian Brownlie (Chichele Professor of Public International Law at the University of Oxford) and his daughter Rebecca: at [1], [10] & [91]. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Normative Challenges of Identification in the Internet of Things: Privacy, Profiling, Discrimination, and the GDPR, Sandra Wachter, University of Oxford – Oxford Internet Institute. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
, David Erdos, University of Cambridge – Faculty of Law Regulating the Information Society: Data Protection and Ireland’s Internet Industry, David Farrell and Niamh Hardiman (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Irish Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming), T. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Efforts from the 13th century Provisions of Oxford were meant to restrict the rise of novel writs without the consent of a Crown Council and thereafter Parliament. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” This is despite China’s National Intelligence Law which requires citizens to cooperate and assist with state intelligence work. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Becerra (2018) (dealing with compelled speech regarding abortion), and Janus v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” (p. 60) Martin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
Monday the Supreme Court issued its opinions (yes, that's intentionally plural) in Glossip v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
