Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court" Results 741 - 760 of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am by Eric Goldman
The court acknowledges the Supermedia case but, perhaps surprisingly, does not discuss Barrett v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
Explanations for why federal courts sometimes treat the private actions of private parties as public actions subject to the Constitution, like the Supreme Court did in Shelley v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:03 am
A legal secretary’s civil complaint against her former employer that includes allegations that associates treat legal staffers like servants might not raise any eyebrows – at least among legal staffers – but one alleging attorneys and management used racial slurs and the workplace is a hotbed of sexual scandal certainly will.In September 2010, legal secretary Jaki Nelson filed suit in the County of Los Angeles Superior Court against Jones Day, alleging… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:08 am by Moseley Collins
Superior Court, (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 1002, involved a mother's claim for NIED caused by a medically caused stillbirth. [read post]
30 Sep 2004, 10:14 am
(As I think I mentioned earlier, I understand that Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson of Marion Superior 6 gave the talk.) [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:54 am
   The court stated that it took this approach based upon the Superior Court’s decision in the case of Pittsburgh Neurosurgery Associates v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately the Court of Appeals reversed Appellate Division's order and remitted the matter to it "for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not determined on the appeal" (see 28 NY3d 1140).Upon remand, the Appellate Division noted that the parties had agree, and it concurred, that Supreme Court erred in treating the petition as an application to confirm the 2013 award and in remitting the matter to the arbitrator for clarification. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
” – Nakatsuru J. in Morris, at para. 1 R v Morris is a sentencing decision delivered in the Ontario Superior Court by Justice S. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 7:38 am by David Wright
But the court rejected treating predominance as a threshold requirement and certified seven different liability issues for class treatment. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by Christopher J. Cavaiola
In answering the question of what process is due, the Court applied the three factors in Mathews v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
  The court first agreed, under Holland v. [read post]