Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 10,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 5:21 am
One reason why Georgia was so quick to resume executions was that it has a shorter waiting period than other states between the time the death warrant is signed and the time that the State may move forward with the execution--just 29 days. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:53 am
I know what you’re thinking if you are a Maryland accident attorney - “But wait, doesn’t King v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
In Ticconi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
However, I’m waiting to see if Twitter’s reinstatement of Trump moots that case. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:45 am
State v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
For the same reasons, the domestic courts recognised that this was an issue which fell into a discretionary area of judgment, where they should defer to the Secretary of State. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:15 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
Federal District Court Rejects Satanic Temple Follower's Challenge to Missouri Abortion Restrictions
22 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
In Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:58 am
We’ll have to wait for the decision to see how the balance turns, but it still seems hard to believe the state will prevail here. [read post]
24 May 2014, 2:14 pm
The United States Supreme Court gave clear criteria in Michigan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:13 am
Question presented: Should the Court grant the petition, vacate the judgment below, and remand to dismiss the appeal as moot, in accordance with United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:25 pm
Waited for what? [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
For such a short and unanimous opinion, Jones v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:04 pm
Hardwick, and he dissented in both Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:45 am
The recent United States Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm
If we consider the ruling of Longmore LJ in the Court of Appeal decision in UK Housing Alliance v Francis (which we discussed here) he states that the Act contains a "pervading reference to money 'paid' by the tenant to the landlord, 'received' by the landlord and 'repayable' by the landlord to the tenant". [read post]
