Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 7581 - 7600
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 3:40 pm
In Sherbert v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 10:08 am
First, the end of August ushered in a hefty $5.7 million civil penalty against a major retailer in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:41 am
Unless a legislature decides to title a law the “Retroactive Punishment of Child Molesters Statute,” the Supreme Court of the United State has held in Smith v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
DIST. 94 v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the inevitable disclosure doctrine and seems willing to expand its scope even beyond other jurisdictions that have adopted the doctrine. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:24 pm
Under U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:59 pm
In the first case, United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
M.S.S. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:27 pm
Bookwalter v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Spoons, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:21 am
The appeals court then noted the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
