Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 12,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Defendants in Iraq oil for food case failed with appeal that criminal offences created by Government pursuant to s.1 United Nations Act 1946 were ultra vires because they were not created “promptly” Patmalneice v SOS Work & Pensions [2011] [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Carman, 14-212, involves two Pennsylvania state troopers who approached the side door of the Carmans’ house on the whimsically named Raspberry Path. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:12 am
The style of the case is Emma Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:31 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Servs. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
(3) An examination of whether notorious foreign infringers have attempted to or succeeded in accessing capital markets in the United States for funding or public offerings [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am
Every day, 1000 people in the United States require emergency room care for dog bites. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am
Every day, 1000 people in the United States require emergency room care for dog bites. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am
United States is whether this emerging situation should lead the courts – ultimately, the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The court in Madrid held, among other things, that prisoners with mental illness should be removed from the Security Housing Unit. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
The question for the Supreme Court in Re McCaughey was whether, as a result of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Silih v Slovenia [2009] ECHR 571, the Supreme Court ought to overrule the decision of the House of Lords in McKerr [2004] 1 WLR 807 that Article 2 applied, by virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998, only to deaths occurring after 2 October 2000. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:44 am
"If _____ v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The new false marking statute will limit lawsuits to being filed only by the government or those that can show a competitive injury from the false marking: (1) IN GENERAL- Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is amended– (A) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ‘Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
