Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
This is the same Republican governor who filed his own brief in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 7:55 am
In Olsen v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
In Nijhawan v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:34 pm
The Supreme Court, see United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:21 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Mohamed v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:43 am
See Southern Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:29 pm
Holder. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
Holder, involves the Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:34 pm
NPS LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:31 am
Eric Holder, Jr, Attorney General, known to those who follow it as the "NAMUDNO" case. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Following the release of any opinions, the Court will hear argument in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
Whitlaw v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
Holder. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
The Taubman Company v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:09 am
It allows the patent-holder to strongly imply they've been copied, even though most of the time there's no copying even being alleged. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
The question arises in Kucana v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:13 am
But the statute clearly says that only the entire state, like Texas (not a political subdivision of it, like the utility district) can ask for a bailout. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Holder (08-495), on a challenge to banishment after felony conviction. [read post]
