Search for: "Works v. State" Results 7621 - 7640 of 60,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2020, 1:11 pm by John McFarland
District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, in Amarillo, recently wrote an opinion in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:02 am by Kara M. Maciel
Lewis for the proposition that such information is protected from disclosure by the work product doctrine, case-by-case determinations will now be required to determine whether a party must provide such information to its opponent in discovery in California state court cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:02 am by Kara M. Maciel
Lewis for the proposition that such information is protected from disclosure by the work product doctrine, case-by-case determinations will now be required to determine whether a party must provide such information to its opponent in discovery in California state court cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:47 am by Kara M. Maciel
Lewis for the proposition that such information is protected from disclosure by the work product doctrine, case-by-case determinations will now be required to determine whether a party must provide such information to its opponent in discovery in California state court cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
Chronic health problems may not constitute a disability within the meaning of ADA or the State’s Human Rights LawSirota v NYC Bd. of Ed., App. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:17 am
[See, also, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, and County of Nassau (Department Of Public Works), U-27544, 6/26/08]The decision in the Weaver case may have an impact on the use of GPS equipment, or the evidence obtained from such devices, in administrative disciplinary hearings.The Weaver decision indicates that "In the early morning hours of December 21, 2005, a State Police Investigator crept underneath Scott Weaver's street-parked van and placed a… [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:34 pm
The Denver University Law Review last year allowed me to contribute quick thoughts about the Supreme Court's work in Rita v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am by admin
Instead, the grandparent(s) must show that the loss of the relationship would work some “physical or emotional harm” to the child. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:30 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
If the statute has worked to preserve a degree of political and social autonomy is the State required to throw away its protections because shadowy backers of WTP [Western Tradition Partnership] seek to promote their interests? [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Conversely, where the Court has found no violation of Article 10 – as in the case of Peruzzi v Italy which concerned the defamation of a judge to his colleagues – the Court reiterates that criminal defamation falls within the margin of appreciation allowed to Contracting States. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:03 am
NO-FAULT - PSYCHOLOGICAL IME - IME BY NON-PHYSICIAN Allstate Social Work a/a/o Daniel & Sonya Jocelyn v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Chapter 324 provided that Port employers pay over to New Jersey, rather than the Commission, the portion of payroll assessments attributable to work in New Jersey. [read post]