Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:58 am
This decision shows an even more progressive interpretation to EU citizenship and residency law than set down in Chen & Ors. v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] ECR I-9925 . [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
The Blackstone Group, L.P., a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit adopted a view of materiality that may potentially reduce the pleading burden of plaintiffs asserting claims under the federal securities laws. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:09 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Fayed v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm
In comments to the SEC, large global audit networks, including the Big Four, said that a new extraterritorial private action for cross-border securities fraud in connection with purchases and sales of securities outside the United States should not be created. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Congress, having referred to the first amendment and stated that it is “necessary to promote the vigorous dialogue necessary to shape public policy in a representative democracy” went on to note that: “some persons are obstructing the free expression rights of United States authors and publishers, and in turn chilling the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States interest of the citizenry in receiving information on… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
" State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:23 pm
I mentioned yesterday that I understood CAAF had granted review in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
" Dow Agrosciences L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
First, this case is going to be considered of a piece with last term's decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am
Randolph thus reversed the district judge’s ruling ordering the release of the petitioners—seventeen Uighur refugees from China—into the United States when the government failed to justify their detention or resettle them elsewhere. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia) Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Innocence ProjectJurisdictional statement and petition for writ of habeas corpus [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
According to the court, Khan’s contentions were wholly speculative and conclusory, and, therefore, are insufficient to satisfy the burden of demonstrating irreparable injury.Kahn also argued that if he were to be out of work for an extended period, he would have to return to Australia and would never be able to obtain United States citizenship. [read post]
