Search for: "House v. State"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 25,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Paul v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 2:51 pm
Herzog v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:58 am
PSKS, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Birmingham decided they were suitable and discharged duty under s.193 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
Birmingham decided they were suitable and discharged duty under s.193 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 pm
First, as to the general availability of Bivens remedies, in Hernandez v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:44 am
EvidenceProf Blog notes that in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:25 am
Facts: This case (Wivell et al v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:30 pm
Facts: This case (Erie Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
Solicitor General to provide the government’s views on whether the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 covers claims that a housing policy had a more negative impact on minority renters or buyers, even if there was no intentional discrimination. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:10 am
In the 2011 Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:57 am
Alcoholism as a defense in a disciplinary actionMurolo v Safir, Appellate Division, 246 A.D.2d 653, Leave to appeal denied, 91 N.Y.2d 813In McEniry v Landi, 84 NY2d 554, the Court of Appeals said that alcoholism qualifies as a disability within the meaning of the State’s Human Rights Law [Section 292.21, Executive Law]. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:11 pm
Akhtar v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 383 [not on bailii yet, we've seen a transcript] When a Local Authority accepts the applicant’s case on a review under s.202 review under Housing Act 1996, is there or should there be a duty to give reasons why the applicant was successful and on what objections they were not successful? [read post]
13 May 2007, 12:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
