Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm
In an amicus brief filed in Davidson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The Supreme Court released its decision on the centuries-old Alien Tort Statute (ATS) in Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
And would could be a more appropriate item to catch up on than the Catch-up case itself, ITV Broadcasting & others v TvCatchup. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am
Moreover, the California decision may be an outlier (or it could be overturned on appeal), as the DC decision is far more consistent with cases like WPIX v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:17 am
Accordingly, the appeals court judgement was reversed and the trial court’s grant of summary judgment against the employee was reinstated (Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:35 pm
These governmental filings state that the items included “plastic straws, plastic knives, rubber bands, plastic corn on the cob holders, broken plastic cups, paper clips, aluminum bottle caps, aluminum foil wrappers,” and other items. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
V. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:37 am
Unauthorized Access to his former employer’s Computers In support of the “no unauthorized access” argument, Nosal argued that: (1) under the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in this case (United States v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:50 pm
This provision further adds to such expenses the enumerated items set forth in Section 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(II, III, IV and V), (iii) and (iv). [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The release also states that both the statutory provision and the proposed rule would apply both to ABS that are sold in registered offerings and those that are sold in exempt transactions. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:30 pm
See GunBroker.com LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:11 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:07 pm
The Commission also addresses SEP owners and states that they “necessarily have to invest in substantiating to SEP users why patents from the patent holder’s portfolio are essential of the standard or how these patent are being infringed”. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
Macy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
In a footnote, the directive notes – citing the EEOC’s 2012 decision in Macy v Holder (CCH Employment Practices Guide ¶6881) as well as other EEOC and federal circuit court decisions – that although sexual orientation and gender identity are not explicitly protected by Title VII, the “EEOC and private litigants continue to develop sex discrimination theory. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. [read post]
