Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D" Results 7681 - 7700 of 10,369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance, A, B, and C read Volokh's publication this month, but next month D, E, and F will read Volokh's publication. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector)   US Patents Congress weighs patent specialisation for federal judges (Ars Technica) (Inventive Step) (Law360) (IP Spotlight) (Patent Prospector) M Lemley & B Sampat’s report ‘Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate’ – experienced examiners allow more, cite less (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PTO problems are not new; the more things change, the more they stay the same (Inventive Step) Peer to… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
[footnote omitted] (original emphasis)Thereafter his Honour referred to the use of the word “knowingly” in civil proceedings with particular reference to that word in relation to the tort of deceit as discussed by the High Court in Magill v Magill (2006) 231 ALR 27. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
§ 1225(b)(2)(C); (2) whether MPP is consistent with any applicable and enforceable non-refoulement obligations; (3) whether MPP is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act requirement of notice-and-comment rulemaking; and (4) whether the district court’s universal preliminary injunction is impermissibly overbroad. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm by Schachtman
Shulman, Richard B. van Breemen, Suzanne Banuvar, Ying Zhou, Geena Epstein, Samad Hedayat, Dejan Nikolic, Elizabeth C. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:52 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
The Report (and enclosed draft legislation, called the “Draft Bill”) provides the following illustrative, non-exhaustive list: (a) bills of exchange, (b) promissory notes, (c) bills of lading, (d) ship’s delivery orders, (e) warehouse receipts, (f) mate’s receipts, (g) marine insurance policies, (h) cargo insurance certificates (section 1(2) of the Draft Bill). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]