Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:03 pm
Newport News Holdings Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 1:08 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:50 pm
Good luck with that fantasy.What I really don't get is the argument that, six years later, John Roberts' opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am
If I cause customers to avoid your business because I express critical opinions about your business—or because I publicly criticize any customers who visit your business (see NAACP v. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
I'll talk about the public-interest analysis again soon (from an antitrust angle), but for now I'd just like to show you (a) the initial determination and, below that one, (b) the ITC's call for public-interest statements (which are due by November 8; by coincidence, that's also the date of the next Qualcomm v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit just handed down an interesting and important right-of-publicity decision, in Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
He concludes, largely on the strength of the SCOTUS opinion in Hartman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:04 pm
The Supreme Court handed down its first major decision construing the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act last week, Van Buren v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm
" Instead of figuring out the whole route from A to Z, we deploy heuristics: rules of thumb that help us chart a course along this complex, adversarial terrain as we traverse it. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:45 am
Falanga v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:13 pm
The first challenge to a photo ID law to reach the Supreme Court—Crawford v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Austin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
The application sought to repress the unauthorized use of Banksy's registered trade marks and reproductions of his/her artworks in the context of an art exhibition in Milan.The text of the decision in RG 52442/2018 Pest Control Office Limited v 24 Ore Cultura s.r.l. is available here.Let's see what happened.BackgroundThe applicant, Pest Control Office, is responsible for issuing certificates of authenticity re Banksy's artworks, and for selling his artworks and organizing… [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
Some of our friends are hard at work figuring out what comes next. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:21 am
I don't know about you, but this kind of light alone makes me nervousState v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
A very good example of a court stepping in is the recent case of Bergstresser v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
The power of a Community collective mark, when contrasted with a protected geographical indication, was put to the test on 2 October, in Cases T-624/13 (noted here), T-625/13, 626/13 and 627/13 The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Delta Lingerie Intervening, when the Eighth Chamber of the General Court of the European Union gave its decision on a series of separate Community trade mark oppositions relating to very similar signs… [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
In Hoffman v. [read post]
