Search for: "Harding v. State" Results 7681 - 7700 of 15,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2012, 8:28 am by Dan
How easy or hard is it to get judicial assistance in the United States? [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
 Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
If the issue of same-sex marriage had been left to the people of the States, it is likely that some States would recognize same-sex marriage and others would not…. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
The external hard drive of [Deprospero’s] computer contained other images, pornographic and otherwise, of [him] and the victim. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Florida, 15-6075, is hard for us to talk about. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
After a little research, I found that the decision referred to was Troxel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
  In fact, with Plaxico Burress having a hard time getting a favorable plea deal (basics here), his lawyers perhaps out to seriously consider heading over to the federal courts in Foley Square to assert Second Amendment claims in an effort to force New York state prosecutors to back off. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am by Adam Wagner
Here it is hard to imagine that a public order disturbance was not intended. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:08 am
Ray and his men, and then their defense teams, were paralyzed in response, and rendered powerless to defend themselves.Through all of this there is exhibited the expression of Executive Government to imprison men for reasons of State. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
Against this background, the judge felt that it would be very difficult to draw hard and fast boundaries between ‘zones’ – whether business or familial in nature. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
The idea that the market would collapse into chaos, though, is hard to swallow -- particularly because the ruling would mean that every state would be simultaneously required to eliminate its tax preferences. [read post]