Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 8,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2011, 6:36 pm
However the 1983 UK case of Merchandising Corporation of America v Harpbond, aka the Adam Ant case, may point that such a conclusion is not necessary easy to arrive at. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
Speaking at Iona College in New York Tuesday, Justice Antonin Scalia said critics of the Bush v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:07 pm
In Williams & Wilkins v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:39 am
“Most of the interview was talking about the impact of this Supreme Court decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
See 18 U.S.C. 1505 ("Whoever corruptly . . . influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, . . . [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm
Hilton’s August 3, 2010 decision in The Medicines Company v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 12:27 pm
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:18 pm
Affirming in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:23 am
This is just another battle in the war for the lives of students, and the first casualty of war is innocence. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:16 am
A very similar case, Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games, dealt with the question of tattoos featured in NBA video games. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 12:54 am
.
TODAY'S STORIES - December 20, 2006
Race-Based Programs May Face Final Curtain in Supreme Court
Legal Times
In 1954, William Coleman Jr. sat next to Thurgood Marshall as he argued Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 4:16 am
For a similar case, see United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:33 pm
Ginsburg United States V. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:37 am
Much as the First Circuit held in Glik v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The case, Big Brows LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
The opponent had argued that its detailed arguments in relation to the high degree of similarity between the goods and services at issue were not examined by the Board of Appeal, which failed to state reasons and infringed its rights of defence. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A claimant’s impairment is “severe” if it meets the standard of Stone v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 5:59 am
“Think Brown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
Per the 1973 Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:55 am
State, 651 S.W.2d 785, 786 n. 3 (Tex. [read post]
