Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 7701 - 7720
of 42,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 7:52 am
In doing so, the court has produced an interesting, and at points troubling precedent of what is meant by a communication to the public by an intermediary service. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
by Elizabeth C. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
As a result, the Yankees have since paid the City $7,352,519 plus interest of $635,132. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:52 am
In doing so, the court has produced an interesting, and at points troubling precedent of what is meant by a communication to the public by an intermediary service. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
Jack C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:06 am
Martin, No. 2011-C-0853, Slip op. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 4:37 am
An interesting critique of this opinion was published on this blog the next day. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
This involves the interpretation of R.C. 4141.282 (C) and (D). [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
An instruction under s. 273.1(2)(c) was therefore warranted. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
After discussing the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(2)’s definition of “disqualified person” and how it applies in this situation, the DOL found that the IRA’s purchase of an interest in the partnership would not constitute a Code section 4975(c)(1) transaction. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
After discussing the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(2)’s definition of “disqualified person” and how it applies in this situation, the DOL found that the IRA’s purchase of an interest in the partnership would not constitute a Code section 4975(c)(1) transaction. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:38 am
After discussing the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(2)’s definition of “disqualified person” and how it applies in this situation, the DOL found that the IRA’s purchase of an interest in the partnership would not constitute a Code section 4975(c)(1) transaction. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Law Offices of Irene C. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:01 am
For those interested, here is the text of the proposed Philadelphia legislation.Coming on the heels of the news, on which I commented two days ago in Life for My Proposed Marcellus Shale User Fee? [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:00 pm
Law Offices of Irene C. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:04 am
” Among the many interesting aspects of the opinion’s detailed description of the competing valuations, the court noted that, while both experts applied a 14% premium to reflect the value of the economic benefits associated with the company’s status as an S corporation, the company’s expert halved the premium due to the risk that the company could elect to become a C corporation in the future. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:28 am
See R.C. 5321.20(C). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
The case also illustrates the challenges individuals have in vindicating their privacy interests in the Internet context. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Tout comme dans Chiasson c. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:44 am
A post at GreenTechMedia titled Range Fuels Officially Dead: Another DOE Loan Bites Dust on the demise of Range Fuels drew two interesting comments:#1. [read post]
