Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7701 - 7720
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
United States, 334 U.S. 742, 767 n.9 (1948) (citation omitted), as well as the Supreme Courts directive in Boumediene that [i]n considering both the procedural and substantive standards used to impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, proper deference must be accorded to the political branches, 128 S.Ct. at 2276 (2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
(C.M.) v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
In December, without any independent evidence that the men had engaged in hostilities against the United States, U.S. officials sent them to Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:17 pm
The decision in Warren v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
Griem v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:55 pm
United States, and Perry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court decided Negusie v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
KSR v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:50 am
Katz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(Ars Technica) RIAA – Shahanda Moursy sues RIAA for fraud, abuse and legal sham (TorrentFreak) Tenenbaum, Joel – Defence team’s unorthodox tactics in illegal file-swapping case incurs judge’s displeasure (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court New Hampshire: Domaining registrar defeats cybersquatting lawsuit: Philbrick v eNom, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) District Court N D… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:23 am
Mills
SUFFOLK COUNTYReal Property
Bank Declared Holder of Subject Mortgage Obtained by 'Allonge' Endorsement
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. [read post]