Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7701 - 7720 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2009, 6:07 am
That's like saying because you went to ...See all stories on this topic   Ashcroft v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:28 pm by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Carroll, and Bayla Ostrach Health law and policy in the United States are, in many senses, driven by a desire to control. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:20 am by Sheppard Mullin
  On January 5, 2011, the Third Circuit issued its decision in New Jersey Retail Merchants Association v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 3:25 am by Xandra Kramer
Mr Justice Fraser stated that separate legal personality of the constituent entities of corporate group represents a fundamental principle of English law (at [92]) and claimants failed to provide evidence of high degree of control and direction by RDS sufficient to meet the three-fold test on the existence of duty of care set by Caparo Industries plc v Dickman and clarified by Chandler v Cape. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
When such ceilings are exceeded, the burden is on the Crown prosecutor to rebut the presumption of unreasonable delay for reasons of “exceptional circumstances. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am by Florian Mueller
You can click on any of the links below to go straight to the part you're most interested in:Effective App Store commission ("App Store tax") rate peaks at 35.25% (plus annual developer program fee plus Search Ads) -- a relative increase by 17.5%IP-related issues surrounding web appsRecent United States Senate hearing: mixed blessing for Epic's caseStatement of Objections from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) in the… [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:22 pm by Sami Azhari
Hasner), students who schemed with their professors to turn in plagiarized work (United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:21 am by ksmcarlson
This is a considerable shift from present practices of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiff brought derivative claims in an action filed in the United States District Court on behalf of the company for breach of fiduciary duty; aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; abuse of control; unjust enrichment; and violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]