Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 7701 - 7720 of 10,420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm by Schachtman
  The sordid affair is described in detail in a published decision of the United States Court of Appeals, In re School Asbestos Litigation, 977 F.2d 764 (3d Cir. 1992). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
Defendants correctly point out, however, that Reporters Committee interpreted the Freedom of Information Act and therefore `tells us only when something is private under a statute, not whether a person has an expectation of privacy under the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 6:34 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
United States, 436 U.S. 238, 243 (1978): Several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code require third persons to collect taxes from the taxpayer. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 am by SHG
An individual facing serious criminal charges brought by the United States has little but the Constitution and his attorney standing between him and prison. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm by Ilya Somin
And Article III also gives federal courts jurisdiction over “all controversies to which the United States shall be a party,” controversies between a state and citizens of another state, and controversies between citizens of different states. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am by David Post
It's a pretty complicated and strange-looking little legal animal that Mr. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am by Patryk I. Labuda
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]