Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 7701 - 7720 of 11,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
This paper draws a comparison between COVID claims and asbestos claims, the “Largest and Longest” wave of occupational disease claims in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am by Robert Cook-Deegan
  It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:31 pm by Kelly
(TechnoLlama) The Economist on the state of the music industry (Michael Geist) Global – Trade Marks & Domain Names Applications for ‘There’s an App’ (IPKat) Global – Patents Broad patents, big settlements: are we living in strange times? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
A statute enacted under the State's police power whose effect but not purpose is to curtail the liberty of individuals to live their lives must bear a reasonable relationship, and some proportion to, the alleged public good which justifies the restriction of individual liberty. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(IP finance)   Global - Patents Access to Research for Development and Innovation scheme gives Patent Offices in developing countries free or low-cost access to 150 online scientific journals (Patenting Lives) (Spicy IP) IP strategies for high growth companies (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Is IP causing global warming? [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:43 am by Ezra Rosser
The return of judicial discretion with the United Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]