Search for: "United States v. May" Results 7701 - 7720 of 47,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2024, 9:08 am by Luciano Alvarado
The main support for this argument came in the form of a colloquy between two senators, in which Senator Leahy stated that “subsection 102(a) was drafted in part to do away with [the] precedent . . . that private offers for sale or private uses or secret processes practiced in the United States . . . may be deemed patent-defeating prior art. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am by Richard Samp
Ever since the Solicitor General filed a petition for certiorari in December on behalf of the government in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
In 2001, Stylus took a lease of two units on the pier in order to run a bingo hall and arcade. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
MEDL did argue that its app was national in scope, so it didn’t target Kansas; but the court says that MEDL may have been targeting all 50 states simultaneously. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office):"Today's ruling enjoining the PTO from implementing its controversial rules on continuations and claims is a sound decision that reflects the concerns we expressed in our amicus brief. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:42 am by Heidi A. Nadel
On June 30, 2016, the SJC granted Further Appellate Review on the parties' cross-petitions in Blanchard v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:09 am
The judge found that the regime for testing pesticides in the United Kingdom did not take into account the proximity to crop spraying of many residents and consequently was not in compliance with the Directive.This decision may be appealed and in the meantime the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will need to determine how to handle the judgment's ramifications in the short term. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am by Jay Willis
Commentators continue to weigh in on last Thursday's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am by SHG
United States, Justice Elena Kagan might be right that “most of Government is unconstitutional. [read post]
Furthermore, Article 62 of the ICJ Statute stipulates that a state may request to intervene in a contentious case if the state “consider[s] that it has an interest of a legal nature which may be affected by the decision in the case. [read post]