Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 17,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 11:45 am
Shukh sued his former employer Seagate asking for a correction of inventorship under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
However, the Rule 4(b) (1) notice does not divest the district court of jurisdiction to correct a clerical error in the judgment or correct a sentence under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:52 am
Following plaintiffs' objections to the magistrate judge's order recommending that defendants' motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:30 am
The Federal Circuit explained that the 1952 Patent Act codified the common law rule, meaning that laches was codified as a defense under 35 U.S.C. 282. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
Ex. 1001, 1:11–14,1:33–35. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Of particularrelevance, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:46 am
Slaybaugh was convicted of violating Indiana Code § 35–42–4–1(a). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 8:51 am
What he did not count on was the bicyclist, a 35 year old Chicago pastry chef, having the wherewithal to snap a photo of his license plate. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
"Plaintiff briefly complains that Defendants’ descriptions of the patent claims are 'oversimplifications,' but it does not delineate what, if anything, Defendants leave out. . . . [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:34 pm
Southern California Associated Newspapers (1950) 35 Cal. 2d 121, 128.) [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 12:23 pm
Patent 7,153,555 (“Raymond”) under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
First, the § 315(b) time bar does not impact the Board’s authority to invalidate a patent claim—it only bars particular petitioners from challenging the claim. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
But the Federal Circuit has provided substantial guidance on the interpretation of the corresponding terms in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:25 am
" The combination of SMART and SERIES "does not result in a mark which as a whole has a nondescriptive or incongruous meaning. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 12:42 pm
What it does mean is that you start your case off on your own 35 yard-line instead of at the 50 yard-line; you have to be mindful of the need to gain credibility and starting with voir dire and opening statements. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:39 am
See Viacom, 676 F.3d at 34–35. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
As a design patent, the patentee does not claim a new and useful invention, but rather the “ornamental design” as shown in the figure below. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
The Court does not disagree that the patented inventions, at some level, contain an implementation of the abstract idea of 'packaging and transmitting information.' However, every invention can be reduced to some form of an abstract idea. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:34 pm
For example, one-third of the principal is distributed at age 30, half at 35 and the rest at 40. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:09 pm
With that, the Federal Circuit found that it does indeed have appellate jurisdiction to hear the appeal. [read post]
