Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 7721 - 7740 of 11,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  One example: textbook publisher talks about IP not being nearly as important as getting on an approved curricular list in a few big states. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
…[emphasis added] In contrast, in Pollard v BABN, the court was clearly interested in committing the patentee to its earlier proposed construction, many years prior: [80] The SCC [in Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, 2000 SCC 66] did not address the possibility that the Patent Office may fail to insist on amendments to claims to reflect representations made by the applicant. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Devin O. Pendas
[v] Heinrich von Treitschke, Politics, ed. by Hans Kohn (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963 [1898]), pp. 300-301. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Furthermore, she was awarded pre-judgment interest at a rate of 2.5 percent for seven years. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am by Peter Mahler
” Court Denies Summary Judgment Concerning Disputed 10% Membership Interest in Brooklyn Restaurant Galarza v Galarza, 2020 NY Slip Op 33801(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 6, 2020]. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
From the few facts we have, it appears he would have had a difficult time doing that, but his point was that he should have had the opportunity to try. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Richard Hunt
Oct. 15, 2018) is an interesting case for only one reason. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm by Marty Lederman
  Few if any prosecutions are initiated for marijuana possession—even, recently, in Colorado and Washington, where state law does not pick up the slack. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In its replies and in the grounds of appeal, the appellant provided comments on the video content and a few screenshots. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Thus, in my view, the periodicity of the “constitutionalism” Loughlin attributes to the United States seems off, and the story more complex and interesting. [read post]