Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 7721 - 7740
of 28,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The DOMA (Section 3) case before the high court was United States v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday morning in Virginia Uranium Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:15 pm
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:51 am
When the Supreme Court hands down its ruling in this Term’s blockbuster abortion case, the Justices should make clear that courts should not rubberstamp laws that deny women liberty, equality, and dignity.At issue in the case of Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:22 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:08 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s August decision in Cruz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
about the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:27 pm
Virginia from 1967, Zablocki v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
In that sense, Justice Scalia seemed to be drawing an even harder line than the petitioners. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
However, a review of the authorities led to the inexorable conclusion that there was a clear and constant line of Strasbourg jurisprudence which (per Lord Kerr, at [48]): “[e]stablish[es] that the state is obliged under art 3 to conduct an effective investigation into crimes which involve serious violence to persons, whether that has been carried out by state agents or individual criminals. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
” That rule often requires courts to draw fine lines. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
The Court goes on to state that last term’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
DOJ.AB: And—to steal your line—I agree with your last point. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
Pennsylvania State Univ. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
Klocke v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:10 am
Under State v. [read post]
