Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 7721 - 7740 of 57,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
The lien, which can be sent to the defendant, the defendant's attorney and the plaintiff's attorney, would include the amount of reasonable charges for services rendered. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:02 pm
Defendant did not show a sufficient issue of fact to get a suppression hearing. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:52 am by Allison Tussey
The defendant was the former manager of the Texas State Bank branch, McAllen, Texas. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 6:07 am
Why is Microsoft having to defend so many claims, and why does it cost so much? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:09 pm
Just today I appeared in a municipal court (name omitted) where this happened. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am by Mark Ashton
 The fact that the name, hometown, school district and photos posted seemed to correspond to the Defendant was insufficient. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Defendant, therefore, met its burden as the moving party when it negated the sole basis of plaintiff’s claims—namely, the alleged excessive notary fee under section 8211. [read post]
18 May 2009, 1:01 pm
New York State is unusual in giving people a right to deny the use of their image (or voice or name) for commercial purposes). [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:05 am
On the day of trial, the prosecutor approached the defense attorney and indicated that the arresting trooper informed her that prior to the defendant's arrest he had been called to back up the State Police in Concord relative to a report, by a named caller who gave his cell number, of a group of individuals in a truck with a gun. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:12 pm by Michael C. Smith
Defendants contended that the Texas-based defendants should not defeat transfer and implied that they were only named as defendants to manufacture venue. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:42 am by Wystan Ackerman
This holding is potentially helpful to defendants in other contexts, such as data breach cases where standing is often highly individualized. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint to reflect a name change of one of the parties. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:35 am
All Defendants: Despite the case's name, the ruling fails to resolve all litigation pending throughout the universe. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
It also concluded that even if the list was exclusive, the defendant’s use of another person’s name, date of birth, and address would fall under the catch-all category. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am
Actual injury often cannot be proven on a classwide basis by simply using the evidence that the named representatives will adduce in support of their personal claims. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
As CNN reports, the suit was filed on March 19th with two California couples as the named plaintiffs. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relying on very different cases (e.g., misappropriation of domain names, which are exclusive under the DNS), the court ruled that, “to the extent that embodiment of intangible rights in a document is required, Plaintiffs have alleged that their intangible rights were reduced to documents, namely, their photographs” and “Defendants allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of the right to choose how their images would be used and of the value of their use,”… [read post]