Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 7741 - 7760
of 8,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2009, 5:01 am
Accordingly, when Mr Justice Mann delivered his blockbusting 280-paragraph judgment in Lucasfilm Ltd, Star Wars Production Ltd and Lucasfilm Entertainment Co Ltd v Ainsworth and Shepperton Design Studios Ltd [2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch) in July 2008, it was almost inevitable that the dark forces which brought this legal battle from the US courts to the Chancery Division for England and Wales would launch a further sequel before the Court of Appeal -- whose judgment was handed down… [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) ACS:Law and Logistep currently seeking settlement from around 6000 alleged file-sharers but ISPs doubt accuracy of evidence (TorrentFreak) We should have embraced Napster says BPI boss Geoff Taylor in op-ed piece for BBC (Ars Technica) United States US General – Decisions 9th Circuit: Anti-spyware company protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2): Zango v Kaspersky Lab (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents How… [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:04 am
And from law created in 1924 in Carroll v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 4:35 pm
Mr X did not give up the battle and appealed the 2014 judgement. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 8:11 am
You may have heard the name of this case before, but in most states the admissibility of expert testimony is governed by a Supreme Court case from the 1990s, Daubert v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:29 am
"United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 10:58 am
Some states may require the custodial parent involved to give written notice of a move that is intended to the other parent. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 1:11 pm
Bonds in Bonds v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
” (Burwell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Enforcement of Injunction Stayed in View of Patent Reexamination In Flexiteek v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:23 am
Ruskin acknowledges, the case of Weitz & Luxenberg v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:55 am
In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:37 am
The archival records of the European Patent Office (EPO) reveal that the little Central European state has been authorised to enter into negotiations on a validation and co-operation agreement with the EPO. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
Who won Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
See Starrs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:04 am
Even the definition, based on the Supreme Court’s test in Davis v. [read post]
