Search for: "House v. House"
Results 7761 - 7780
of 41,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
The first of the two cases—40 Main Street Offices, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
On April 20, they submitted a relatively short preliminary report to the Senate and House Armed Services committees, with their recommendations for a pilot program in what appears to be an effort to get ahead of the Defense Department report, or at least influence its drafting. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In the face of this traditional judicial lassitude, “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof” were all a litigant could hope to accomplish in litigation. [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm
v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:25 pm
Bielousov v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:15 am
This had been proposed as rule of law in some cases, but was better considered as an implied term, following Stirling v Maitland (1864) 5 B & S 840. [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:04 am
Cessar v Malta App. [read post]
9 May 2020, 7:09 am
Or, on Monday, when the Court of Appeal gives judgment in Arkin v Marshall, the whole Practice Direction might be quashed. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 4:00 am
On 7/4/1974, the Supreme Court would decide U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 pm
Congress Needs to be Way, Way Bigger By David Litt, Author, Democracy in One Book or Less David Litt argues that, to adequately represent the needs of the people, the House of Representatives should increase its size. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:30 am
House of Blues New Orleans Rest. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:43 pm
.), for sex-specific emergency shelters and coreligionist housing under the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and for adoption or foster care practices giving child placement preferences to Indian tribes under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.). [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
E.g., United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:26 am
Also worth noting what looks like an interesting Judicial Review decision in the joined cases of R (Mohamed) v Waltham Forest LBC, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (HCLG) intervening and R (Mohamed) v Wimbledon Magistrates’ Court, Waltham Forest LBC et al, Secretary of State for HCLG intervening (2020) EWHC 1083 (Admin). [read post]
