Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 7761 - 7780 of 11,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm by Ilya Somin
As a policy matter, I think it would be desirable to limit the extent of gifts justices can receive from private parties, thereby banning the kinds of very large gifts that Justice Thomas, among others, has gotten. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:05 am by Steve Vladeck
(Such a concession also led Justice Alito to concur, even though, as he explained in a separate opinion joined by Justice Thomas, he does not believe that unnamed class members could otherwise have been bound by class arbitral awards when they did not individually consent to class-wide proceedings.) [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It now has returned the matter to the states and said basically “have at it. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:33 am by David Lat
Circuit (for Judge David Sentelle) and SCOTUS (for Justice Clarence Thomas). [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:49 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas, following his usual practice, asked no questions and made no comments. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:07 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Bettwy, an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of California and an Adjunct Professor of Law at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law, where he teaches a course – which long anticipated mine! [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:52 am by SHG
No matter how ridiculous or performative the nonsense may be. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
One of the criticisms levelled at the decision in Oakley (in a “perceptive” note by my colleague, Dr Joanna Bell: para 58) is that it left unclear the circumstances in which a reason-giving requirement would be imposed on planning decisions as a matter of common law. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:55 am by SOIssues
Rice County District Judge Thomas Neuville directed both sides to submit a memorandum on the issue by Dec. 10, and said he would take the matter under advisement Dec. 13. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 8:55 pm
Congress has designated February 11th (the anniversary of the birth of the inventor Thomas Alva Edison, who had over 1,000 patents) as “National Inventor’s Day. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
  For the majority, it did not matter that the speech involved is “commercial” speech – instead of, for example, speech by an individual about politics – even though the Court in other cases has said that the government can impose more regulations on speech about commercial matters because it receives less protection under the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 3:35 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
To understand this rejection, we need to return to the heart of the matter: the interpretation of article 3 a). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 10:32 pm by Fiona de Londras
Sabine Jansen and Thomas Spijkerboer recently released their report entitled Fleeing Homophobia: Asylum Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Europe in which the record of European states is assessed. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:52 am by Ronald Mann
  And matters got worse for Freeman when O’Connell suggested that the Court need not worry about liability of consumers because HUD could protect them as a matter of prosecutorial discretion. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:32 pm
Thus matters of kinship, personal bias, state policy, remoteness of interest would seem generally to be matters merely of legislative discretion. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am by Charles Sartain
  If the intent of Congress is clear that’s the end of the matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:02 am by Scott Bomboy
The 11th Amendment, ratified in 1795, cleared up a matter about lawsuits against states and sovereign immunity. [read post]