Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 7761 - 7780 of 57,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 9:57 am
Because I am not interested in disparaging any particular lawyer, I will not identify the case names in this blog. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 pm
The defendant, herein, used a fictitious name to sign the purchase agreement and travelers' checks, but did not claim the name represented anyone but himself or that anyone but himself had made or drawn the documents. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 3:13 pm
The separation between the time of the arrest and the time of the search tends to negate the justification for a search incident to arrest, namely the protection of the officers, and the prevention of the destruction of evidence. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 5:18 pm
The officer named as low crime areas in the City "Staten Island, Queens, parts of Manhattan. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:40 am
" Though the plaintiffs contend that "high level corporate officials" issued certain management directives, the plaintiffs "do not identify any of these officials, by name, by title, or even by job description. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 3:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to the Court's assessment of their risk levels, criminal defendant one and defendant two, by Notice of Motion challenged the constitutionality of SORA. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The detective and his partner arrived at Kennedy Airport about 5 A.M., and the supervisor showed them a cardboard box which was sealed with gummed tape and which had defendant's name on it. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 3:42 pm
  RPs let a  brand name drug-maker delay or limit competition by a  maker of a generic copycat. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:52 am
’   The second one, by Clemenceau, and I do not recommend it at all:   ‘He has no ideas, but he defends them passionately. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:41 am by Jonathan L. Shapiro
As the law’s first anniversary approaches, federal courts continue to adjudicate claims arising under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:41 am by Jonathan L. Shapiro
As the law’s first anniversary approaches, federal courts continue to adjudicate claims arising under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Paladin Enterprises, Inc., the Fourth Circuit held that the publisher of a book named Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors, a guide focused on successfully soliciting, preparing for, and committing murder for hire, could not rely on the First Amendment as a bar to civil liability. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As to the identification notice, the defendant argued that it was insufficiently specific both because it did not unambiguously state whether the identification procedure utilized in the emergency room of the hospital on the night of the assault was a lineup or a show-up, and because the names and exact number of the police witnesses who also identified him at the hospital were not specified. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 8:42 am by Moseley Collins
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this elder abuse case and its proceedings.) [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:41 am by Moseley Collins
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this medical negligence case and its proceedings.) [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Given the procedural posture of the case, including defendant's pending Motion to Compel Arbitration … and defendant's Motion to Dismiss …, the court will allow plaintiff some time before she needs to reveal her identity. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:25 am by Steve Baird
The University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School further complains that the defendant has filed for federal registration of the claimed mark WHARTON ADVISORS CORP, noting that the words ADVISORS CORP have been disclaimed, “leaving the University’s mark WHARTON as the sole distinctive element” of the defendant’s claimed mark. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  Before filing her first health care liability claim, plaintiff did not send the statutorily required pre-suit notices to the two named defendants. [read post]