Search for: "United States v. May" Results 7761 - 7780 of 47,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
climax in the litigation before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which reached a verdict in May.[5] In the latest development of this restitution saga, the ECtHR rejected the Getty’s appeal of a 2019 confiscation order issued by the Italian courts.[6] According to the Getty Trust, the order – and, consequently, the Italian State – had violated Art. 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which sanctions the right to the peaceful… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
Second, taking care of the Children may require that Respondent travel to Europe, or the Children visit the United States. [read post]
14 May 2024, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The standards for libel differ whether you are in Canada or the United States, so should one or the other decide to sue for libel, it would make a difference where they filed the lawsuit. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:48 am by Wystan Ackerman
Believe it or not, the Supreme Court of the United States just decided whether “to have ‘actual knowledge’ of a piece of information, one must in fact be aware of it. [read post]