Search for: "Brown v Doe" Results 761 - 780 of 5,965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by Peter J. Sluka
Does Capizzi Have an Interest in the 1,600 Contingency Fee Cases in Which the Firm was Counsel at the Time of His Resignation? [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am by Nedim Malovic
For instance, in Ardagh Metal Beverage Holdings GmbH & Co KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (T-668/19), EU: T:2021:420, the EU General Court considered that, the assessment of the distinctiveness of sound marks has to be made as to the ‘resonance’ of the mark and is not subject to a ‘significant departure of the norm’ test developed for, eg, shape marks.In the present case, the fact that shades or nuances ranging from copper to… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson, (drug agency regulating tobacco); King v. [read post]
Public opinion, in fact, has never run as strongly in favor of abortion as it does right now. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
” Proposed data reforms intend to address law enforcements’ use of biometric data, but the proposal does not go in-depth on general biometric deployments, TechCrunch reports. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by Guest Author
How does the major-questions doctrine fit into Chevron’s framework—if it does at all? [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Brown (1980), the Court expressly stated that “[o]ur prior holdings make clear that a public street does not lose its status as a traditional public forum simply because it runs through a residential neighborhood. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Bruen (2022) (BREYER, J., dissenting) (explaining the pitfalls of a "near-exclusive reliance on history" and offering examples of when this Court has "misread" history in the past); Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:32 pm
 In a decision released June 17, 2022, Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
” Although the court ruling does not prevent the EPA from regulating emissions in the future, according to news reports, it makes clear that Congress would have to give clear consent for the agency to act. [read post]