Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 761 - 780
of 3,979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 6:41 am
Allowability of the petition3.1 Requirements for reasoning a decision3.1.1 Under Rule 102(g) EPC the decisions of the Boards of Appeal shall contain reasons. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am
In the Board's view, the "gold" standard for the assessment of Articles 123(2) and 76(1) EPC requires that the subject-matter of an amended claim (or of a claim of a divisional application) be based only on what the skilled person would directly and unambiguously derive from the application as originally filed (or from the earlier application; see G 2/10). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:06 am
Johnston and Paul G. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:35 am
By John C. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
Koleske, Editor, 1995, pages 23-25D6: BYK Additives & Instruments, Product Guide L-G 1, Paint Additives, February 2009D7: WO 2011/084380 A1.V. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
As Nicolas Lamp asks: Is the nullification or impairment of benefits what really matters? [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the data sheet for the polystyrene PS 158 K does not contain any indication regarding the molecular weight of the polymer sold by BASF. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
This was a matter of substance which, in accordance with the guidance in Holmes-Moorhouse at paragraphs 49 to 51, the reviewing officer should have taken into account. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
*The Appellate Division said that Supreme Court erred when it concluded that Mathis was no longer a probationary employee on the date he was terminated because Supreme Court calculated the extension required by 4 NYCRR 4.5(g) using calendar days rather than workdays.In the words of the Appellate Division, “Where, as here, a probationary term is extended pursuant to 4 NYCRR 4.5 (g), the extension is "one workday for every workday" the employee has missed. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
Error #1: The court has no jurisdiction over this matter. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Frey, 03 C 7948, 2005 WL 1139312, at *6 (N.D. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:55 am
P. 8(c)(1) (estoppel is an af- firmative defense). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Such stations must insure that their ENT systems caption non-scripted materials; if the systems don’t caption such materials – whether automatically or as a matter of choice by the station – the station must nevertheless make all emergency information disabled-accessible in some manner. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:02 pm
We strive to provide you with the information and resources necessary to make informed decisions about family law matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:02 pm
We strive to provide you with the information and resources necessary to make informed decisions about family law matters. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am
Matter of Blatt 2023 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam is both a common and unusual attorney story. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Ct. 1813) (Kent, C. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
This principle was laid down in decision T 208/84 [16], re-affirmed in decision T 154/04 [8(G)] and recently confirmed in opinion G 3/08 [10.7.1, 10.13.2 (citing T 154/04), and 12.2.2]). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
Merthyr had applied to stay the claim for the matter to be dealt with through the council’s IHCP. [read post]
