Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C." Results 761 - 780 of 3,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  To establish a trade secret process, the business must prove the following: “(a) the process is a secret, (b) the extent to which the information is known outside of the owner’s business, (c) the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in the owner’s business, (d) the extent of measures taken by the owner to guard the secrecy of the information, (e) the value of the information to the owner and to his… [read post]
20 May 2012, 3:59 pm by Alexandre Atheniense
A Câmara do Congresso Norte Americano aprovou no mês de abril o Projeto de Lei controverso  para compartilhamento de informações dos controversas Cyber e Protection Act (CISPA) ou HS-35. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:45 am
Três meses depois fundou a Associação das Vítimas de Erros Médicos (Avermes) e nas duas últimas décadas já ajudou cerca de duas mil pessoas que, em maioria, sofrem com procedimentos errôneos ginecológicos. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench);… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 11:48 pm by Stéphane Erickson and Ione Deda Alves
De plus, le port d’un couvre-visage dans les établissements commerciaux et dans les immeubles municipaux de la ville de Côte Saint-Luc est obligatoire depuis le 1er juin 2020, et ce, jusqu’au 31 août 2020. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:54 pm
Given that Jan’s work in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond, Austin v LB Southwark, R (Ahmed) v Newham, R (Aweys) v BCC / Moran v Manchester CC, his insight into the coming 12 months is not something you’d want to miss. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Chaque semaine, nous vous présentons un résumé d'une décision d'un tribunal québécois qui nous est fournis par la Société québécoise d'information juridique (SOQUIJ) et ayant un intérêt pancanadien. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Il doit plutôt le faire avec le fondement de la recommandation conjointe, incluant les bénéfices importants de cette dernière pour l’administration de la justice, afin de déterminer s’il y a quelque chose, autre que la durée de la radiation, de l’amende ou de la sanction, qui engage l’intérêt public au sens large ou déconsidère… [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
De l’avis du juge, c’est la faute la plus importante d’Hydro-Québec et Kiewit doit être dédommagée. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Since a lot of readers expressed an interest in the case, I thought I’d update them on what’s happening. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
L’approche de la Cour supérieure sur cette question est bien fondée et il y a lieu de l’avaliser à une nuance près: contrairement à ce que cette dernière affirme, c’est en vertu de l’article 67 (1) d) de la Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité plutôt qu’en vertu de l’article 1035 alinéa 2 C.C.Q., qui prévoit… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This can also happen politically—Reagan Foundation sent a C&D to the Trump campaign for selling Reagan/Trump merchandise. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:27 am by gmlevine
The most recent example is Piearson Industries, Inc. d/b/a Centerfire Firearms v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
 See BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(1)(b), (c), and (h). [read post]