Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 761 - 780 of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hamilton Health Sciences, 2021 HRTO 213 (CanLII) [113] This Tribunal stated in Moore v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
  Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to my Plain English preview of Elonis v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:25 am
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Virginia legislature ratified the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), thus becoming the 38th state to do so and satisfying Article V’s threshold (three quarters of the states) for an amendment to become part of the Constitution. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen covers yesterday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
ARTICLE V(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shallallow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for the taxes… [read post]
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006,… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm by Randy Picker
Viacom and—separately—the English Premier League sued YouTube and Google alleging that they were liable for infringing works that users posted on YouTube. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
From 2005 English language proficiency was required for citizenship. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am by INFORRM
Background The plaintiffs were husband and wife and were Deputies in the States of Jersey Assembly (“the States”). [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
The law in other states might lead to a different result, under a doctrine called "nonmutual collateral estoppel," under which it would be enough that the English case was resolved against Depp, even if it hadn't been resolved in favor of Heard. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 16 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in any proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, and I did the same in Plain English. [read post]