Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 761 - 780
of 13,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Especially if you receive a lot of “branded” search traffic (i.e. searches for your name, firm name, etc). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Especially if you receive a lot of “branded” search traffic (i.e. searches for your name, firm name, etc). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
They’re a joy to wake up to in the morning and they’re elated to see you when you get home from work. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:08 pm
If you're in the know, please email us. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:34 am
In re K.S., 199 Wash.App. 1034 (2017). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:46 am
But in addition to the underlying dissatisfaction, I’m starting to wonder whether we’re seeing an uptick in mass incidents simply because they seem to be very effective. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
However, that is what happened in case of In re Thomas. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:12 am
In a recent Delaware decision issued in In re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This practice formed the basis for rejection of the four Halliburton applications, each of which related to a method of designing a drill bit using simulations based on a finite element analysis, i.e. essentially computer-aided design (CAD) techniques. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:43 am
[Citations to In re LeGrice and In re Donohue omitted.]It is evident that the above-quoted portion of In re Graves constitutes only dicta and thus is not controlling. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
" In re N.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:33 am
In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); see also In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1148, 1149-50 (TTAB 2019). [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 3:44 am
In In re Mars, Inc., [Ser. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
One of the conditions is that the request of re-establishment of rights is filed within two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance (R 136(1)).[2] According to the established case law the cause of non-compliance is removed on the day on which the competent person (i.e. the applicant or the professional representative) becomes aware or should have become aware that the time limit had been missed. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
Aug. 1, 2017) (quoting In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1534 (Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:38 am
Imagine that you're crossing a street at a crosswalk and you have the right of way. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:38 am
The major proposals are the expansion of certification programmes â€" i.e. the institutions accredited to do so â€" as well as a potential raising of the bar. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:04 am
” In other words, you’re either using the same median employee – or one of the alternates – that you identified last year. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:07 pm
Don’t assume that just because you’re paid a salary you’re exempt from overtime eligibility. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 12:30 am
Under Rule 134(2) EPC, if the contracting state is one in which the EPO is located (i.e. [read post]
