Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 761 - 780
of 13,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2012, 1:16 pm
When they're not working, life for the [name withheld] revolves around their 2-year-old daughter, [name withheld]. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:54 am
Fourth, it articulates a theory of “unreasonably delayed” that the courts have not addressed when reviewing agency inaction regarding rulemaking petitions, i.e., that the unreasonable delay inquiry is relative. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:25 am
In re Health Fusion Brands, Inc., Serial No. 77691724 (May 10, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:32 pm
You have money coming to you from a pending law suit, but you’re wondering whether Uncle Sam will want a share of it. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:55 am
In re Saran, Serial No. 78713958 (January 18, 2008) [not precedential].The Board first found that the primary significance of AMERICAN MASALA "is that of a generally known geographic place, i.e., the United States of America. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Especially if you receive a lot of “branded” search traffic (i.e. searches for your name, firm name, etc). [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
Especially if you receive a lot of “branded” search traffic (i.e. searches for your name, firm name, etc). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:02 pm
Laugh when it hurts — a sense of humor and optimism is critical when asking people to do what they most resist (i.e., change). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
I.e., “If I saw this IP number before, it’s probably the same device and the same person I dealt with before. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:08 am
Part of your system will include WHO will do WHAT (i.e. perhaps the lawyer does the initial consultation, but a staff member enters the information into the computer, etc.) [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:17 am
The QS folks were booted by the Times Higher Education folks awhile back, partly for methodological reasons, and perhaps partly because their business model is dubious and full of conflicts of interest (see also). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
In 2004, corporate lobbyists successfully lobbied for a doozy of a corporate tax break--after already getting years of tax deferral on their offshore profits (often profits that should have been taxed in the US, for which companies had dreamed up transfer pricing schemes to move the profits offshore, such as selling IT properties to their offshore subsidiaries at a claimed third-party comparable price, even though they would NEVER really sell it to any third party so it was truly… [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 8:08 pm
If you're in the know, please email us. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:12 am
In a recent Delaware decision issued in In re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:34 am
In re K.S., 199 Wash.App. 1034 (2017). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:46 am
But in addition to the underlying dissatisfaction, I’m starting to wonder whether we’re seeing an uptick in mass incidents simply because they seem to be very effective. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This practice formed the basis for rejection of the four Halliburton applications, each of which related to a method of designing a drill bit using simulations based on a finite element analysis, i.e. essentially computer-aided design (CAD) techniques. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
However, that is what happened in case of In re Thomas. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
They’re a joy to wake up to in the morning and they’re elated to see you when you get home from work. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
Seeing that once again members of the SEC were refusing to answer legislators' questions and statements about what had happened, Ackerman said, "We're talking to ourselves and you're pretending to be here. [read post]
