Search for: "Key v. United States of America"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
We put together a state-by-state breakdown of trucking accidents, including the deadliest states in America for large truck crashes, the most dangerous time of day for truck accidents, and the most common causes of crashes involving large trucks. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:04 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010); and 2. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
All the while, of course, the national citizenry has basically remained asleep, acceding to Madison’s devout wish, in Federalist 40, that they “venerate” the United States Constitution and, in effect, never even think of having a second national convention. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM) United States US General Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
Bloomberg’s Donald Kirk does an excellent job of cataloging the recent overtures of Xi Jinping and his top lieutenants to the key players in the South China Sea, with recent visits to both neighboring countries and the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 10:20 am
Turning to the contempt power, Goodyear focuses on the court’s 1994 decision in International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
A decision by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:37 pm
Many – including the Solicitor General on behalf of the United States – had urged the Court to hear the Athena case. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:21 pm
Trump, '45th President of the United States of America, Washington, D.C.'"; (2) "that the President's tweets from @realDonaldTrump ... are official records that must be preserved under the Presidential Records Act"; and (3) that the @realDonaldTrump account has been used in the course of the appointment of officers (including cabinet secretaries), the removal of officers, and the conduct of foreign policy -- all of which are squarely executive… [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:07 am
On July 7, United States Patent & Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal encouraged stakeholders to submit amicus briefs with a view to the Director review of the PTAB decisions in two cases involving challenges to patents asserted by VLSI Technology against Intel. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
It needs to be taken into consideration that monetary compensation is the norm, not a rare exception, in the real world as far as the technology sector (from chipsets to cars) is concerned.In the United States, the fact that someone licensed a patent doesn't necessarily preclude the patent holder from being granted injunctive relief. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
