Search for: "Law v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 157,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
But since the federal law itself seemed in this instance to incorporate state law in this respect, Toy argued to the CCA that a recording made in violation of Hawaii's two-party consent law was inadmissible under federal law as well. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
OQ (India) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal "Where a person sought a right of entry and residence as a dependant of a European Union citizen, it was not a requirement to ask whether the claimed dependency arose from a need for the support of such a citizen. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:07 am
Regina (QY) (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Even if the assumption was made that removing a foreign national who had forfeited the right to remain could amount to an interference with private life within the meaning of article 8.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, her removal was nevertheless [...] [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:42 am by sally
Regina (Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “Age discrimination against immigrant spouses aged under 21 was justified. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal "A convicted person seeking compensation after the reversal of his conviction on the basis of new or newly discovered facts establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there was a miscarriage of justice had to show that the facts were unknown to him during the trial or appeal. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Buckingham
  Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:45 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post State Redistricting Under Gaffney v Cummings appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
That judgment, now nearly two centuries old, is Judge Thomas Ruffin’s infamous opinion for the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 7:50 am
Regina (Limbu and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others Queen’s Bench Division “It was irrational for the Secretary of State for the Home Department to rely on a discretionary policy relating to settlement entry for Gurkha veterans where that discretion could only be exercised in favour of indefinite leave to remain on the basis of restrictive express factors. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:44 am
Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Aaron and Others Court of Appeal “In company director disqualification proceedings, the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform could not rely on findings of fact by the Financial Ombudsman Service but he could rely on facts and opinions expressed by the Financial Services Authority. [read post]