Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court" Results 761 - 780 of 857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 4:30 am by Kaviraj Singh
(See Section 34 of the Act) (iii) Property rights in a trade mark acquired by use are superior to similar rights obtained by registration under the Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
In general, the main proposals are based on long-discredited approaches to public control of competitive markets—micromanagement of specific practices such as “self-preferencing,” product “bundling,” or competing with customers. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
California and Protect App-based Drivers, Alameda County Superior Ct. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:50 am
Consider respondeat superior principles in the medium of internet service provider services. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 7:30 am by David Super
  We argue that if we just repeal the filibuster, or impeach Donald Trump (with no prospects of a conviction), or knock Donald Trump off the ballot over January 6, or convict him of felonies, or resuscitate the Voting Rights Act, or intimidate Senator Joe Manchin, or expand the Supreme Court, or hold an Article V convention, or something else, we will be fine. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:16 pm by Bona Law PC
The District of Columbia Attorney General has also filed a similar action in the Superior Court of D.C., alleging violations of the D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
Second, from a prosecutorial discretionary policy perspective, sometimes various allegations such as the over breadth of a section of the Criminal Code are dismissed as relatively unimportant in the real world.[19]  One of the main arguments that is used for dismissing these allegations in Canada is the claim that it is hoped that prosecutorial discretion will prevent enforcement of Statutes and Legislation in circumstances in which liability would be unwarranted.[20] For example, in… [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 7:46 pm by Rick
I think it’s quite likely that Proposition 19 will trump California’s medical marijuana laws and allow local municipalities to apply restrictions that, thus far, they have been blocked from implementing by the combination of the Compassionate Use Act and the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The main constitutional reasons given to justify the legal ban on contingency fees are translated into economic terms and further elaborated. [read post]