Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe" Results 761 - 780 of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am by Tana Fye
”[13]  Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[14]  The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[15] … [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If Title VI requires colleges and universities to adopt the audience perspective, then that settles the matter. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:59 am by Aurel Sari
Matters would be different if Turkey’s territory were subject to an armed attack from within Syrian territory or if Turkish forces, vessels or aircraft were attacked in or over the Mediterranean Sea. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:00 am by Mai El-Sadany
(If a permanent member abstains instead, the resolution can still be adopted.) [read post]
6 May 2023, 1:03 am by INFORRM
The Judgment may not however entirely have put the matter to bed, since it does not contain a clear statement on what may constitute “non-material damage” for the purposes of Article 82(1). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
After the hearing, an Assistant Deputy Commissioner (ADC) recommended a penalty of dismissal, which the Commissioner adopted. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
After the hearing, an Assistant Deputy Commissioner (ADC) recommended a penalty of dismissal, which the Commissioner adopted. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Three and a half years ago, in Does It Make Tax Cents? [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Peter Vodola
  Nowhere in the Osprey opinion does the Court adopt the Defendants' proposed definition of the civil offense of barratry. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
There is one final point – does any of this actually matter? [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
This is because: "there is scope under EU law for member states to adopt a fair use doctrine as a matter of national law, and [the InfoSoc Directive] does not necessarily preclude it (not least because, in our view, [the InfoSoc Directive] has not harmonized the adaptation right [this is also the reason why the Report does not see any obstacles to the adoption of an "innovation exception"]). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:51 am by Bob Ambrogi
In virtually any type of matter these days, competent representation of a client requires broad knowledge of the technology issues that may affect that client and the client’s matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 11:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
"But this amendment was rejected in a voice vote and then the Senate voted 23-17 to adopt an amendment saying "that it is not expedient to act upon the nomination of John I. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 8:55 pm by Anthony Gaughan
The beyond a reasonable doubt standard is a requirement of due process, but the Constitution neither prohibits trial courts from defining reasonable doubt nor requires them to do so as a matter of course. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:47 am by SHG
Instead, Judge Posner went right to what mattered to him. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:02 pm by Barry Barnett
But, the Supreme Court has held, it does not make laws of nature, natural phenomena, or abstract ideas patentable. [read post]