Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 118,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2018, 5:16 pm
The post State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 2:23 pm
One of these was Jae Lee v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
Correction officers may be sued by prisoners seeking money damages for alleged violations of 42 USC §1983 rights in state supreme courtHaywood v Drown et al, Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York, USSC No. 07-10374.Decided May 26, 2009New York's Correction Law §24 provides that New York State's trial courts of general jurisdiction cannot entertain §1983 suits filed by prison inmates seeking money… [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
On May 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
By contrast, where constitutional rights are involved, state law may be displaced. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:26 pm
Based on what Bloomberg reported earlier this month, a second United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Second, some courts have held that actions for damages may be maintained against state officials in their individual capacity. [read post]
31 May 2016, 7:03 am
In Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 1:14 pm
Calabotta v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
Under section 325(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the Secretary of State may issue guidance to these “responsible authorities”. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Illinois Bible Colleges Association v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
9 May 2004, 5:01 pm
On May 10, 1886, the US Supreme Court ruled in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:47 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that judges may consider a defendant's post-sentencing rehabilitation as a permissible factor supporting a downward sentencing variance under 18 USC § 3553(a) [text]. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:10 am
Similarly, the fact that some investors may have liquidated covered securities in their retirement accounts to fund their Stanford investments was not determinative, because these sales were not a necessary part of the fraud.Roland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:21 am
State Farm. [read post]
