Search for: "Parent v. State"
Results 761 - 780
of 13,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father are the married parents of several children. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:25 pm
Any agreement between the parents to raise the children in the United States was not dispositive. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
But if the women aren't, in fact, registered with the state as domestic partners or married, they will need to do an adoption or bring a parentage action under the UPA to get full legal clarity and protection for the parent and child relationships of non-birthing partner and child. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
However, controversy stems both from the very character of the offence – the notion that it intrudes improperly on parental rights – and from the fact that it is an offence of strict liability – the prosecution does not need to prove that the parent acted in any way unreasonably in failing to secure the child’s attendance at school (see Islington LBC v D [2011] EWHC 990 (Admin)) or even that the parent knew about the absence (see Crump… [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:25 am
Cabinet for Health and Family Services v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 11:00 am
In Lasche v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 9:57 am
In Barton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 9:03 am
Council v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
If your biological parents had stayed unmarried, you'd be free to stay in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
The recent case of Sieglein v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
The recent case of Sieglein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
Estate of Manolios v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:09 am
In the recent case of Force v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
In Arcella v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
Parents should be involved. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 6:44 am
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 3:28 am
Here is the opinion in Rosalind M. v. [read post]