Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 761 - 780
of 52,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 7:52 am
The Court held one case—People v Orlewicz — in abeyance, pending a decision in People v Vaughn. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 11:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s the opinion in People v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm
But the adversely affected lender (Deo) appeals, saying that you can't do that in a criminal case -- that it's a civil matter (and that the civil rule is different).But it seems to me that you can indeed short circuit things when you've already resolved the relevant criminal case. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
That's good too.But singling out the defendant and having the bailiff follow him and him alone around seems incredibly prejudicial, especially in an assault case. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:37 pm
Where as in People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:15 pm
Carter v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
It's unusual for an actual case to mimick a joke. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
For example, take this case. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
”PEOPLE V. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:23 am
Sandford (1857)The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)Lochner v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
Holder (the defendant is always named as the current Attorney General — the case started out as Golan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
In the case of G2000 v. 2000, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court showed Chinese Trademark Law is still more interesting than the Leifeng Pagoda in Hangzhou, and the Hong Kong star sex scandal. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Dudley-Baton v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:04 pm
I'm reading this case, which is in the California Supreme Court, and I had an inkling that, since it was there, it was probably a death case. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 12:32 pm
Everyone concedes that his belief that the thing -- in this case, his mother -- was a demon is relevant to the sanity phase. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Regardless of what happens to you thereafter (and, as Justice Liu notes, one-third of people arrested for a felony don't ultimately get convicted of one). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
For another, if and when they do sufficiently change, I have a strong feeling that the initial articulation of a "right to incest" won't be made in a case like this one. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:32 pm
The New York Court of Appeals on Tuesday decided People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
In the case of Brown v Texas, the People's burden of proof as to the programmatic purpose is derived from the constitutional principle underlying the reasonableness of a suspicionless roadblock stop, i.e., a weighing of the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure, the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and the severity of the interference with individual liberty. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
