Search for: "People v. House"
Results 761 - 780
of 11,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:37 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
’s house really tip the balance? [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
Judgment Fact or opinion In assessing whether the advert was a statement of fact or opinion, the Judge considered the five points outlined by Nicklin J in Kousogiannis v Random House [2019] EWHC 48 (QB). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
Bah v The United Kingdom - 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 This is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the regulations for eligibility for housing support, after the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster v Morris [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
Bah v The United Kingdom - 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 This is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the regulations for eligibility for housing support, after the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster v Morris [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
From Richard v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
This was the issue in Burgueno v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
A House-Senate conference committee has reported out the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act providing for a sweeping overhaul of the regulation of US financial services and markets. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am
Texas already releases 72,000 people per year, so most folks in TDCJ are going to get out. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
The recent judgments in Kay v United Kingdom (ECHR, 21 September 2010) and Manchester City Council v Pinnock (UK Supreme Court, 3 November 2010), and the implications which they have for Irish housing authorities under the ECHR Act 2003 will be discussed in detail. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm
Coolidge v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
Hounslow argued that decisions on provision of social housing can only be challenged by way of judicial review, citing O’Rourke v Camden LBC [1998] A.C. 188, in which the House of Lords struck out a claim for damages for a failure to accommodate as homeless pursuant to s.63(1) Housing Act 1985. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
Doe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:21 am
Case citation: Klayman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
To prioritise the Claimant, would potentially have a huge impact on the other people on the waiting list for housing. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:09 pm
HUD is clearly much less interested in helping people obey the law than in punishing people who fail to obey it. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:38 am
how did Day find these videos–was it by following people she knew personally, or did she randomly stumble on it, in which case how did the videos get into the poster’s hands? [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
The informant has killed twelve people instead of previously raiding twelve stash houses. [read post]
