Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
This week at the CCAs: AFCCA will hear oral argument at 1000 tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
Crowdsourcing commercialised (IPKat) P2P (seminar): the aftermath (IPKat) Hargreaves Review (Kluwer Patent Blog) United States US Patents Microsoft joins Article One’s new preemptive troll-fighting service (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court affirms high standard of proving patents invalid – Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (IAM) (IPBiz)… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
For Lord Phillips, and the other five judges in the majority, the Mirror Principle won out [62, per Lord Phillips]: “It would not be satisfactory for the Coroner to conduct an inquest that did not satisfy the requirements of Article 2, leaving open the possibility of the appellants making a claim against the United Kingdom before the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The deadline for either a cert petition or request for additional time to file a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
A United States patent is presumed valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
United States. 36 Colum. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
The decision in McCaughey will not impose a Human Rights Act obligation on the state to investigate pre-commencement deaths, as had been argued in McKerr. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:12 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am
§ 601(g)–that he live in the United States for at least five years between the ages of 13 and 21. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
There, the CAFC rejected the "reasonable manner" approach:Neither Phillips nor any other opinion of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, our predecessor court, or this court has endorsed the T.T.A.B. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Together with Lothar Phillips he developed the concept of quantitative justice and fairness and its impact on decision systems, and on the idea of humanity. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:44 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
In Radmacher v. [read post]
