Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 761 - 780 of 1,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses the Montana campaign finance case as an example of “how the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has upended important state campaign spending laws. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by Matthew Huisman
Supreme Court Insider: Our Supreme Court newsletter on Wednesday featured: an interview with Montana’s attorney general on the case from his state that could get the Court to reconsider Citizens United; a report on Paul Clement’s not-great day arguing before the Court; and a profile of Drinker Biddle’s Lawrence Fox, who got the Court’s attention with a powerful legal ethics brief in Maples v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:49 pm by Matt DeVries
  In honor of Professor Jones, today's post is about the Supremes' decision in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Orin Kerr
Justice Nelson (joined by Justice Wheat) suggests that under United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:30 am by Tony Mauro
Last December, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a longstanding state law ban on corporate independent expenditures, in spite of the Ctizens United decision. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:14 am by Alison Rowe
 He registered this logo with the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:06 am by Rick Hasen
  (Here‘s the 2d Circuit on that opinion: The Court is aware of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:09 pm by Rick Hasen
Bloomberg BNA: “Challengers of Montana’s ban on corporate spending in state election campaigns will file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court “promptly,” seeking to overrule a state court decision that it is in conflict with the high court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:37 am by Sam Favate
Ginsburg also said: “Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:18 am by nflatow
” “Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:19 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a Montana Supreme Court's ruling upholding the Montana state PAC requirement for corporate campaign expenditures, even in the face of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:23 pm by Jaimie Cremeans
Montana [opinion, PDF] appears to conflict with the 2010 US Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]