Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 761 - 780 of 9,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Montana’s First Judicial District Court is being asked to review the state Legislature’s “Food Freedom” bills enacted in 2021 and 2023. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In affirming the trial court’s judgment denying the petitions, the First District Court of Appeal – in addressing what it termed “an issue of first impression in California” — followed uniform Federal law in holding the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA; 49 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
  First, the Court states that an agency's interpretation of its own rules is entitled to deference and a reviewing court generally will not depart from that interpretation unless it is clearly erroneous or unauthorized (citing Physicians & Surgeons Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
The district court’s uncritical acceptance of the government’s position, and disregard of contrary evidence marshalled by al-Alwi, was therefore an improper abdication of judicial responsibility which warrant [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Finding itself bound by Pickup, the district court in this case dismissed Plaintiff Brian Tingley's challenge to Washington's nearly identical law. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:05 am
The Supreme Court has stated "judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 10:25 am by Daniel Cappetta
The Supreme Judicial Court recently issued two decisions – Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
In the United States District Court, only a few judges (Chasanow, Motz, Bennett, Legg, Blake, Davis, Quarles) regularly direct that their opinions be posted. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:37 am by Unknown
§ 2112, when petitions are filed in multiple courts in the first 10 days of a rule, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation randomly draws one of those courts to review the consolidated petitions. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:31 am by Patricia Salkin
First, the court concluded that Bloomington did not delegate its legislative authority IU and thus, did not violate Indiana Constitution. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:46 am by Harold O'Grady
One of the first decisions to address the question was Rutgers v. [read post]