Search for: "State v. J. Hill" Results 761 - 780 of 927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Go buy Beverley Hills, but not on Amazon.comLifestyle Equities v Amazon UK Services [2021] EWHC 118 (January 2021)Lifestyle owns the BEVERLEY HILLS POLO CLUB brand. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office)   China Get involved in Chinese… [read post]
Anderson on developments in foreign relations and international law, Stephanie Pell on cyber issues, Alan Rozenshtein on social media and content moderation, Daniel Byman and J. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by WSLL
Craig, SeniorAssistant Attorney General; Andrew J. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
Sherard, Wheatland, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Petitioner): Patrick J. [read post]