Search for: "Stuart v. State" Results 761 - 780 of 941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Hayley Evans
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
   Martin (pictured at left giving the oral argument in State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am by Frank Cranmer
Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme In reply to a written question from Valerie Vaz (Lab, Walsall South) asking the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport permanently to exempt spending on repairs and renovations to listed places of worship from VAT, Stuart Andrew, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at DCMS, replied as follows: “The Government recognises that listed places of worship represent some of the nation’s finest heritage, and… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:14 pm by William McGrath
The Court also rejected arguments regarding the production of documents, the ability of defendants to secure foreign documents by Letters Rogatory, or the production of documents under Brady v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by David Luban
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
Dennis, Contrivance and Collusion: The Corporate Origins of Shareholder Derivative Litigation in the United States, 67 Rutgers U. [read post]