Search for: "The People v. English"
Results 761 - 780
of 2,885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:11 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Vejdeland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
[Day v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:56 am
It took me a few days to obtain an unofficial English translation. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:48 am
Flagged Protection v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
The FTT considered that the words in List B are not “specialist terms” but instead have “ordinary English meanings”. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:50 pm
BoltonYou'll notice there are a few English cases in the mix, but they are ones that, I think, are nonetheless, classics of American common law, generally because of their entrenchment in the American 1L curriculum.Also, you'll notice I have not included any U.S. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
Perfectly sane and apparently happy people throw themselves off bridges and in front of trains with no warning at all. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Wirt represented the Cherokee in the 1831 U.S. court case, Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
The officers were sending messages in their free time from their personal electronic devices, which most people would surely see as a prima facie “private” activity. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:15 am
In an English case, Corby Group Litigation v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 8:08 am
In Matter of Albany Basketball & Sports Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 2:06 pm
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s analogy in her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
