Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court" Results 761 - 780 of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
CalPERS, which has a $265 million contract with Caremark, is not a plaintiff in the lawsuit, which was unsealed in Los Angeles Superior Court in June. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
  There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:10 pm by Gene Killian
Recently, though, a retired New Jersey Appellate Division Judge temporarily assigned to the Superior Court in Atlantic County essentially said, “Not so fast. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:17 am by Fathima Cader
First, the court held that, as per Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
When you read R. v. [read post]