Search for: "Treat v. Superior Court"
Results 761 - 780
of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
CalPERS, which has a $265 million contract with Caremark, is not a plaintiff in the lawsuit, which was unsealed in Los Angeles Superior Court in June. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
As noted below, the First Circuit, applying the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
There have been a number of County Court judgments on this issue which have not necessarily been ad idem (see eg our post on Augustin v Barnet). [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:50 am
Essentially, the MSA is a contract and is treated as such by the family court. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
Superior Co., Nicastro v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Court, Santa Clara, 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1012 (Cal. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:41 am
In the recent decision of Andrikopolous v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 3:14 pm
Constantakis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
Superior Court (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 81, 88 (Sababin).) [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 12:10 pm
Recently, though, a retired New Jersey Appellate Division Judge temporarily assigned to the Superior Court in Atlantic County essentially said, “Not so fast. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
Edwards Lifesciences AG, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided in Hively v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:17 am
First, the court held that, as per Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:00 pm
Hey, Superior Court, it’s okay. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
The court says this is similar to the cyberlaw classic ProCD v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
Superior Court Discusion Ochoa v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:40 pm
[1] IPC (USA), Inc. v. [read post]