Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 7781 - 7800
of 10,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
Supp. 2d 1176, 1183 (D. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:15 pm
Supp. 2d 1176, 1183 (D. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am
AK brought the present JR, asserting that: a) the policy discriminates indirectly against women without proper justification contrary to s19 and thus s29 of the Equality Act 2010 b) Westminster was in breach of the Public Sector Equality Duty in failing to assess the policy’s impact, and c) the policy amounted to a breach of Article 14 ECHR obligations, read with Article 8. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 6:30 am
López Dávila* La abogacía y los servicios jurídicos en general están experimentando una auténtica revolución en otras latitudes del planeta. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
AGRICULTURE.Porter, Read D. and Nina C. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
[b.] [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:57 pm
Así, no es infrecuente por desgracia que la corporación municipal “penalice” al Secretario o Interventor minorándole sus retribuciones ( complemento específico, por ejemplo) por alguna de estas inconfesables razones: a) Por haber emitido informes que apoyaron tesis del equipo de gobierno anterior; b) Por haber obtenido la plaza en el Ayuntamiento o Diputación pese a que había un candidato “oficial” llamado al cargo;… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
The key relevant provisions here relate to the "effective integration" principle (responsibility for addressing impact assigned to the appropriate level and function; ¶ 19 (a)) and the "appropriate action" principle (as a function of placement in the chain of causation and extent of leverage in addressing impacts; ¶19(b)). [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:58 am
C. 1951(b)(2). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Forced sale of the defaulting member's interest; and/or d. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:50 pm
Code § 171.002(a)(3), (c). [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
See Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Doe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
LEXIS 71069 (D. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Mercy Hospitals East Communities, d/b/a Mercy Hospital – Washington, et al., No. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:06 pm
ALJ Shaw determined that International Patent Application PCT/NZ93/0004 did not disclose the first, second, third or fourth steps of claim 1 of the ‘896 patent, or steps (b),(c), (d), (e), and (g) of claim 12. [read post]